BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 14 May 2025 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2008 Reinterpretation of Early and Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Thong Pha Phum area, western Thailand, in the context of new material from western and northern Thailand
Sachiko Agematsu, Katsuo Sashida, Apsorn Sardsud
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Early and Middle Ordovician conodonts are described and illustrated from the Thong Pha Phum and Kanchanaburi areas in western Thailand and the Li area in northern Thailand. The Thong Pha Phum fauna consists of 14 species representing ten genera and one unidentified species, and from the Kanchanaburi and Li sections two and five species, respectively, have been recovered. Two conodont zones, the Triangulodus larapintinensis and Aurilobodus leptosomatus zones, are established in the Thong Pha Phum section. The fauna from the T. larapintinensis Zone includes Panderodus nogamii, Triangulodus larapintinensis, and species of Juanognathus, and the A. leptosomatus Zone is characterized by A. leptosomatus, Histiodella holodentata, and Plectodina onychodonta. Two regression events are recorded in a lower part of the Thong Pha Phum section. The conodont biostratigraphy indicates that the regressions took place in latest Early Ordovician and earliest Middle Ordovician.

Introduction

Paleontological knowledge of the Ordovician strata in Thailand started with the publication by Brown et al. (1951). Since they reported a cephalopod specimen from Ron Phibun in southern Thailand, various Ordovician fossils have been described from the southern areas of peninsular Thailand (Hamada et al., 1975; Wongwanich et al., 1990; Cocks et al., 2005). Ordovician sedimentary rocks are also distributed in northern, northwestern, and western Thailand (Bunopas, 1992). Hahn and Siebenhüner (1982) reported occurrences of Ordovician trilobites, gastropods, bivalves, graptolites, and conodonts from northern and northwestern areas in Thailand, around Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Mae Hong Song, and Mae Sariang. In western Thailand, Kobayashi (1961, 1984) and Stait and Burrett (1984) described cephalopods from limestone beds in the Tak and Kanchanaburi areas, respectively. Ordovician limestones and siliciclastics distributed in the Thong Pha Phum and Kanchanaburi areas in western Thailand contain nautiloids, brachiopods, trilobites, and conodonts (Hagan and Kemper, 1976; Bunopas, 1981). However, these paleontological studies are only few compared with those in southern peninsular Thailand, because intensive metamorphism affected the Lower Paleozoic sedimentary rocks in northern, northwestern, and western Thailand (Bunopas, 1981) and these mountainous areas do not permit access. We worked in the field in northern, northwestern, and western Thailand between 2001 and 2005, and recovered several Ordovician conodont faunas. The occurrence of conodonts in the Thong Pha Phum area was already reported by Agematsu et al. (2006a). This study taxonomically describes these conodonts together with newly discovered Ordovician conodont faunas from the Kanchanaburi and Li areas in western and northern Thailand.

Geological setting

Lower Paleozoic sedimentary rocks distributed in northern, northwestern, and western Thailand were deposited on the Sibumasu Block, which is one of the major continental blocks in Southeast Asia (Bunopas, 1992; Metcalfe, 2006). Bunopas (1981) classified these rocks and subdivided them into the Upper Cambrian to Middle Ordovician Chao Nen Quartzite Formation and the Middle Ordovician Tha Manao Limestone Formation. The Chao Nen Quartzite Formation is subdivided into a lower, a middle, and an upper member. The lower member mainly comprises fine- to medium-grained sandstone and quartzite, and the middle member consists of sandstone beds with shale and limestone layers yielding Late Cambrian trilobites. The upper member is composed of sandstone and limestone, which contains shell fragments, including Ordovician nautiloids, gastropods, pelecypods, and brachiopods. The Tha Manao Limestone Formation conformably overlies the Chao Nen Quartzite Formation and is classified into a lower and an upper member. The lower member is characterized by calcareous mudstone, sandstone, and limestone, containing Ordovician nautiloids. The upper member is thinly bedded limestone with sandstone layers. Bunopas (1981) tentatively compared these formations with the Cambrian Tarutao Formation and the Ordovician Thung Song Formation, which were established in southern peninsular Thailand (Bunopas, 1981).

Bunopas (1992) integrated Lower Paleozoic sedimentary rocks distributed in northern, northwestern, western, and southern Thailand into the Tarutao and Thung Song groups (formations). Nomenclature of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequences in southern peninsular Thailand has recently been reviewed and revised (Cocks et al., 2005). However, it is difficult to precisely compare Lower Paleozoic strata in the northern, northwestern and western areas with those in the southern area of Thailand, because these strata contain a large variety of rocks (Bunopas, 1981) and lithostratigraphic studies are insufficient in northern, northwestern, and western Thailand. In this study, we follow Bunopas (1992) and use the name Thung Song Formation for the Ordovician limestone sequences in the study area.

Conodont biostratigraphy

Conodonts were recovered from sections in the Thong Pha Phum, Kanchanaburi, and Li areas (Figure 1). The Thong Pha Phum section, about 400 m thick, is located along a small road, which is about 5 km northeast of Thong Pha Phum City (Agematsu et al., 2006a). Agematsu et al. (2006a) reported occurrences of 43 species of conodonts belonging to 26 genera and established four conodont zones. This study reconsiders these conodont specimens and systematically describes 14 species representing 10 genera and 1 unidentified species (Table 1). Based on reexaminations of the conodont biostratigraphy, the Triangulodus larapintinensis range Zone and the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Range Zone are established (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

1, Index map showing the study areas and the distribution of Ordovician sedimentary rocks. 2, Locality of the Li section. 3, Locality of the Kanchanaburi and Thong Pha Phum sections.

i1342-8144-12-2-181-f01.gif

Table 1.

List of conodonts recovered from the Thong Pha Phum, Kanchanaburi, and Li sections. Numbers on the right side of each species name represent the number of element contained in each 1 kg sample.

i1342-8144-12-2-181-t01.gif

Figure 2.

Column of the Thong Pha Phum section showing the stratigraphic distribution of conodonts.

i1342-8144-12-2-181-f02.gif

Triangulodus larapintinensis Range Zone

The lower zone in the Thong Pha Phum section ranges from 20 m to 110 m above the base of the section. This zone coincides with the stratigraphic range of Triangulodus larapintinensis (Crespin, 1943). Panderodus nogamii (Lee, 1975) occurs throughout the zone and Juanognathus variabilis Serpagli, 1974 and Juanognathus jaanussoni Serpagli, 1974 are contained in the lower part of the zone. The upper part of this zone is characterized by occurrences of Drepanoistodus costatus (Abaimova, 1971), Ansella jemtlandica (Löfgren, 1978), and Bergstroemognathus sp.

The nominate species, T. larapintinensis, has been reported from Australia and Thailand (Cooper, 1981; Watson, 1988; Stait and Druce, 1993; Zhen et al., 2003a; Agematsu et al., 2006b). This species has a relatively long stratigraphic range, which covers an interval corresponding to the Reutterodus andinus Zone to the Histiodella holodentata Zone in the North American Midcontinent standard (Figure 3). Two species of Juanognathus Serpagli, which were first described by Serpagli (1974), are representative species of late Early Ordovician and early Middle Ordovician strata in North America, South China, Argentina, and Australia (e.g., Ethington and Clark, 1981; Repetski, 1982; Wang and Luo, 1984; Albanesi, 1998a; Zhen et al., 2003a). These species occur mainly from the strata, which are compared with the R. andinus Zone in the Midcontinent standard and Oepikodus evae Zone in the North Atlantic standard. Stratigraphic ranges of these species extend into the older and younger strata in South China (Wang et al., 1996). Therefore, the T. larapintinensis Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section is roughly correlated with the R. andinus Zone in the Midcontinent standard and O. evae Zone in the North Atlantic standard (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Age of the Kanchanaburi and Li sections and correlation of the conodont zones in the Thong Pha Phum section with the standard zonations in the North American Midcontinent and North Atlantic schemes.

i1342-8144-12-2-181-f03.gif

Aurilobodus leptosomatus Range Zone

The upper range zone includes the interval of 330 m to 390 m above the base of the Thong Pha Phum section (Figure 2). The base and top of this zone are defined by the first and last occurrences of Aurilobodus leptosomatus An in An et al., (1983), respectively. This zone contains Histiodella holodentata Ethington and Clark, 1981 in the lower part and Panderodus nogamii, Plectodina onychodonta An and Xu in An et al., (1983), Drepanoistodus basiovalis (Sergeeva, 1963), Ansella nevadensis (Ethington and Schumacher, 1969), Oelandodus sp., and Juanognathus sp. in the upper part.

A. leptosomatus is a characteristic species in North China and Australia and has been reported from Lower and Middle Ordovician strata, corresponding to the R. andinus to Phragmoduspre-flexuosus” zones in the Midcontinent standard (An et al., 1983; Watson, 1988; Stait and Druce, 1993; Kuhn and Barnes, 2005). H. holodentata is an index species of the H. holodentata Zone in North America (Ethington and Clark, 1981). This species is known from Middle Ordovician rocks in North and South China, and these rocks are contemporaneous with the Histiodella sinuosa to Phragmoduspre-flexuosus” zones in the Midcontinent standard and the Eoplacognathus suecicus to Baltoniodus norrlandicus zones in the North Atlantic standard (Wang et al., 1996). Watson (1988) also described this species from the Middle Ordovician sequence in Australia. P. onychodonta has been reported from the Middle Ordovician rocks in North China and Australia (An et al., 1983; Wang et al., 1996; Nicoll and Metcalfe, 2001). These strata are equivalent with the P. “pre-flexuosus” Zone to the Cahabagnathus friendsvillensis Zone in the Midcontinent standard. Stratigraphic ranges of these species indicate that the A. leptosomatus Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section is comparable to the H. sinuosa Zone to the C. friendsvillensis Zone in the Midcontinent standard (Figure 3).

Conodonts from the Kanchanaburi section

The Kanchanaburi section is located along the northern foot of Mt. Tham, about 12 km north of Kanchanaburi City. This section consists of bedded gray limestone, about 40 m in thickness, and contains poorly preserved conodonts, Drepanoistodus costatus and Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856 (Table 1). The Kanchanaburi section only shares D. costatus with the Thong Pha Phum and Li sections. S. striatus is a generally known species in the North Atlantic area and ranges from the Paroistodus proteus Zone to the Baltoniodus norrlandicus Zone in the North Atlantic standard zonation (Tolmacheva, 2006). D. costatus is also a long-ranging species, and has been known from strata corresponding to the Oepikodus evae to Lenodus variabilis zones in the North Atlantic standard (Zhen et al., 2003b). Therefore, the Kanchanaburi section is roughly correlated with the Oepikodus evae to Baltoniodus norrlandicus zones in the North Atlantic standard (Figure 3).

Conodonts from the Li section

The Li section lies about 25 km west of Li City along the Ping River (Figure 1). This section, about 10 m thick, is made up of bedded gray limestone. Conodonts recovered from the section are poorly preserved, but are identified with five species belonging to five genera, Drepanoistodus costatus, Juanognathus jaanussoni, Panderodus nogamii, Triangulodus larapintinensis, and Phragmodus sp. (Table 1). These are common species of faunas from the T. larapintinensis Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section, except for Phragmodus sp. A faunal correlation between the Li and Thong Pha Phum section is difficult, because the Li fauna has few conodonts. However, the Li section may be an equivalent to the T. larapintinensis Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section (Figure 3).

Depositional environment and sea-level change of the Thong Pha Phum section

Depositional environment of the Thong Pha Phum section is here inferred from field observations and thin section analyses. Reconstructed paleoenvironments and sea-level changes are shown in Figure 4. The lithology of the Thong Pha Phum section was described in detail by Agematsu et al. (2006a). The lower strata of the section, about 300 m thick, consist of calcareous sandstones and limestones cemented by sparite. These rocks contain abundant fossils, for example, trilobites, brachiopods, and shell fragments, and silt- to coarse-grained quartz. Some limestone beds of the lower part exhibit cross laminations (Figure 4). The upper 100 m of the section is made up of limestones with a micrite matrix (Figure 4). Macrofossils, such as trilobites, nautiloids, and shell fragments, and silt-grained quartz occur from these limestones. Agematsu et al. (2006a) interpreted the depositional environments of the section as follows: limestone and calcareous sandstone of the lower part of the section deposited in a high-energy, middle or outer shelf and shoal condition; micritic limestone of the upper part of the section accumulated in a deeper-water, middle or outer shelf environment (Figure 4). The sea-level changes in the Thong Pha Phum section are shown in Figure 4. The section is divided into two parts: the lower 300 m of strata are interpreted as a relatively low sea-level interval and the upper 100 m is a high sea-level interval. Two major regression events, which are represented by sedimentation of two calcareous sandstone beds, are recognized in the lowstand interval (Figure 4). On the basis of the conodont biostratigraphy, these regressions took place during the latest Early Ordovician and earliest Middle Ordovician time.

Figure 4.

Lithologic column of the Thong Pha Phum section, reconstructed depositional environments, and sea-level change.

i1342-8144-12-2-181-f04.gif

Summary

Ordovician conodonts, which are reported by Agematsu et al. (2006a) from the Thong Pha Phum area in western Thailand, are reexamined and taxonomically described as 14 species belonging to 10 genera and one unidentified species. Two conodont biostratigraphic zones, the lower Triangulodus larapintinensis Range Zone and the upper Aurilobodus leptosomatus Range Zone, are established in the Thong Pha Phum section. The T. larapintinensis Zone is correlated with the Reutterodus andinus Zone in the North American Midcontinent standard zonation and the Oepikodus evae Zone in the North Atlantic standard zonation. The A. leptosomatus Zone is inferred to be an equivalent to the Histiodella sinuosa to Cahabagnathus friendsvillensis zones in the Midcontinent standard. Conodonts recovered from the Kanchanaburi area in western Thailand and the Li area in northern Thailand are identified with two and five species, respectively. The Li section is biostratigraphically comparable with the T. larapintinensis Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section.

The Thong Pha Phum section is divided into the uppermost Lower Ordovician to Middle Ordovician low sea-level interval and the Middle Ordovician high sealevel interval. Two major regression events, which took place in latest Early Ordovician and earliest Middle Ordovician, are recorded in the lowstand interval.

Systematic paleontology

All specimens described in this paper are deposited in the Institute of Geoscience, University of Tsukuba, with the prefix IGUT. Conodont taxa herein are only classified to genus and species. Genera and species are listed in alphabetical order. Element terminology basically follows that of Barnes et al. (1979).

Genus AurilobodusXiang and Zhang in An et al., 1983

Type species.—Tricladiodus? aurilobodus Lee, 1975.

Aurilobodus leptosomatus An in An et al., 1983 Figures 7.3, 7.4

  • Aurilobodus leptosomatus An in An et al., 1983, p. 72, 73, pl. 21, figs. 14–17, pl. 22, fig. 1; Kuhn and Barnes, 2005, p. 319, fig. 2.1, 2.2; Agematsu et al., 2006a, fig. 7.12, 7.16.

  • Aurilobodus? leptosomatus An. Stait and Druce, 1993, p. 302, fig. 17. a–c.

  • Juanognathus leptosomatus (An). Watson, 1988, p. 116, pl. 1, figs. 1–3, 6; Lehnert, 1995, p. 92, 93, pl. 12, fig. 9, pl. 13, fig. 4.

  • Material.—Three specimens; one asymmetrical and two symmetrical elements (IGUT-ag2028IGUT-ag2029, 3547).

    Remarks.Watson (1988) recognized asymmetrical t and t' and symmetrical s and s' elements as an apparatus of this species. Specimens recovered from the study section coincide with his t and s elements.

    Occurrence.—This species has been known from the Floian to the lower Darriwilian strata in North China and Australia (An et al., 1983; Watson, 1988; Stait and Druce, 1993). Specimens of this species are also contained in the A. leptosomatus Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section.

    Genus Bergstroemognathus Serpagli, 1974

    Type species.—Oistodus extensus Graves and Ellison, 1941

    Bergstroemognathus sp. Figures 5.3, 5.4, 7.1

    Figure 5.

    SEM photos of conodonts. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. 1–2, Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856. 1, lateral and aboral views of the acontiodiform element from sample 07, Kanchanaburi section, IGUT-ag3566, ×80; 2, lateral and aboral views of scandodiform element from sample 05, Kanchanaburi section, IGUT-ag3564, ×80. 3–4, Bergstroemognathus sp. 3, posterior and aboral views of c element from sample 15, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2026, ×50; 4, lateral view of g element from sample 18, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3489, ×80. 5–7, Oelandodus sp. 5, lateral view of a element from sample 17, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3495, ×150; 6, lateral and aboral views of f element from sample 17, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3497, ×100; 7, lateral view of b element from sample 17, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3494, ×150. 8, Coniform indet. A, lateral and aboral views, sample 17, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3549, ×70. 9–11, 14, Panderodus nogamii (Lee, 1975). 9, lateral and aboral views of a element from sample 11, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3511, ×150; 10, lateral and aboral views of c element from sample 11, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3506, ×100; 11, lateral and aboral views of b element from sample 17, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3502, ×150; 14, lateral and aboral views of g element from sample 18, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3520, ×150. 12–13, Juanognathus jaanussoni Serpagli, 1974. 11, lateral and aboral views of b element from sample 31, Li section, IGUT-ag3562, ×150; 12, lateral and aboral views of a element from sample 24, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3546, ×150.

    i1342-8144-12-2-181-f05.gif

    Material.—Eight specimens; three c, one d, and two g elements (IGUT-ag2026, 3489 to 3493).

    Description.—Palmate alate c element is anteroposteriorly compressed. Fused, high denticles are located on lateral processes. Anterior face is gently convex. Small basal cavity opens below the cusp and is expanded posteriorly. d element is bipennate with a large cusp and denticulated anterior and posterior processes. The processes are laterally compressed and discrete denticles are inclined inwardly. Basal cavity is lozenge-shaped in aboral view. g element is strongly compressed anteroposteriorly and has thinly denticulated anterior process.

    Remarks.—According to Zhen et al. (2001), the apparatus of Bergstroemognathus consists of a, b, c, d, e, f, and g elements. Although c, d, and g elements are included in the study section, their poor preservation prevents an identification of species.

    Occurrence.—These elements occur in the uppermost part of the Triangulodus larapintinensis Zone and the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section.

    Genus Drepanoistodus Lindström, 1971

    Type species.—Oistodus forceps Lindström, 1955

    Drepanoistodus costatus (Abaimova, 1971) Figures 6.1–3

    Figure 6.

    SEM photos of conodonts. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. 1–3, Drepanoistodus costatus (Abaimova, 1971). 1, lateral and aboral views of c element from sample 27, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3543, ×100; 2, lateral and aboral views of d element from sample 18, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3541, ×150; 3, lateral and aboral views of e element from sample 30, Li section, IGUTag3559, ×100. 4–8, Triangulodus larapintinensis (Crespin, 1943). 4, lateral and aboral views of d element from sample 31, Li section, IGUT-ag3552, ×150; 5, lateral and aboral views of c element from sample 28, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3475, ×150; 6, lateral and aboral views of b element from sample 28, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3476, ×100; 7, lateral and aboral views of a element from sample 28, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3473, ×150; 8, lateral and aboral views of f element from sample 24, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3483, ×100.

    i1342-8144-12-2-181-f06.gif

    Figure 7.

    Line illustrations of conodonts. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. 1, Bergstroemognathus sp., lateral and aboral views of d element from sample 15, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag3492, ×100. 2, Plectodina onychodonta An and Xu in An et al., 1983, lateral and aboral views of g element from sample 18, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2019, ×150. 3–4, Aurilobodus leptosomatus An in An et al., 1983. 3, posterior view of s element from sample 13, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2028, ×100; 4, posterior and aboral views of t element from sample 15, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2029, ×100. 5, Juanognathus sp., posterior and aboral views, sample 18, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2022, ×150. 6, Juanognathus variabilis Serpagli, 1974, posterior and aboral views of b element from sample 21, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2002, ×100. 7, Histiodella holodentata Ethington and Clark, 1981, lateral view of bladelike element from sample 15, Thong Pha Phum section, IGUT-ag2025, ×150.

    i1342-8144-12-2-181-f07.gif
  • Drepanodus costatus Abaimova, 1971, p. 490, pl. 10, fig. 6, text-fig. 3.

  • Drepanodus pitjanti Cooper, 1981, p. 162, pl. 26, figs. 3–5, 7, 8; Watson, 1988, p. 111, pl. 3, figs. 14, 16, 17, pl. 5, fig. 15; Albanesi, 1998b, p. 136, pl. 4, figs. 1–7, text-fig. 16.

  • Drepanoistodus costatus (Abaimova). Stait and Druce, 1993, p. 303, figs. 12.l–m, 17.j–n; Zhen et al., 2003a, p. 191, 194, fig. 15.a–r.

  • Scolopodus cornutiformis Lee, 1976, p. 172, pl. 2, fig. 18.

  • Scolopodus ordosensis Wang and Luo, 1984, p. 284, pl. 4, figs. 22, 23.

  • Material.—Ten specimens; five c, three d, and two e elements (IGUT-ag3541 to 3545, 3557 to 3561, 3572).

    Remarks.—We follow an apparatus reconstruction of Zhen et al. (2003b). Specimens recovered from the study sections are identified with c, d, and g elements.

    Occurrence.—This species has been reported from Floian to Darriwilian rocks in Australia, Argentina, Siberia, and China (e.g., Abaimova, 1971; Cooper, 1981; Wang and Luo, 1984; Stait and Druce, 1993; Albanesi, 1998b). The Thong Pha Phum, Kanchanaburi, and Li sections in this study contain this species.

    Genus Histiodella Harris, 1962

    Type species.—Histiodella alfrons Harris, 1962.

    Histiodella holodentata Ethington and Clark, 1981 Figure 7.7

  • Histiodella holodentata Ethington and Clark, 1981, p. 47, 48, pl. 4, figs. 1, 3, 4, 16; Nowlan and Thurlow, 1983, pl. 1, figs. 1, 3, 5; Watson, 1988, p. 115, 116, pl. 4, figs. 15, 20; Lehnert, 1995, p. 90, 91, pl. 9, figs. 7, 10, pl. 11, fig. 7; Wang et al., 1996, pl. 1, figs. 12, 13; Keller and Lehnert, 1998, fig. 10.3; Rasmussen, 2001, p. 82, pl. 7, figs. 18, 19; Du et al., 2005, p. 365, pl. 1, figs. 22–26, 28. Agematsu et al., 2006a, fig. 7.18.

  • Histiodella sinuosa (Graves and Ellison). Barnes and Poplawski, 1973, p. 776, pl. 1, figs. 17, 18.

  • Histiodella sp. 1 Harris, Bergström, Ethington, and Ross, 1979, pl. 1, fig. 9.

  • Histiodella infrequensa An in An et al., 1983, pl. 25, fig. 2.

  • Histiodella serrata Harris. Wang and Luo, 1984. p. 262, 263, pl. 10, fig. 1, pl. 11, figs. 6, 7.

  • Histiodella tableheadensis Stouge, 1984, p. 87, 88, pl. 18, figs. 8, 12– 14, text-fig. 17.

  • Material.—One bladelike element (IGUT-ag2025).

    Remarks.—Element coincides with the description by Ethington and Clark (1981). They recognized bladelike elements, symmetrical elements, and oistodiform elements in an apparatus of Histiodella.

    Occurrence.—Since the erection of H. holodentata and the delineation of the H. holodentata Zone in Middle Ordovician deposits of Utah, North America (Ethington and Clark, 1981), the taxon has been recognized in many parts of the world (see synonymy). In this study, the single specimen has been recovered from the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section.

    Genus Juanognathus Serpagli, 1974

    Type species.—Juanognathus variabilis Serpagli, 1974.

    Juanognathus jaanussoni Serpagli, 1974 Figures 5.12, 5.13

  • Juanognathus jaanussoni Serpagli. Albanesi, 1998b, p. 125, pl. 5, figs. 1–9, text-fig. 13 (including synonymy); Johnston and Barnes, 2000, p. 21, pl. 13, fig. 11; Pyle and Barnes, 2002, p. 75, 76, pl. 24, figs. 5–8.

  • Material.—Two specimens; one a element and one b element (IGUT-ag3546, 3562).

    Remarks.—Collection of this study contains subsymmetrical and asymmetrical coniform elements. These forms accord with a description of a and b elements of Albanesi (1998b).

    Occurrence.Albanesi (1998b) described this species from the uppermost part of the Third Stage to lower Darriwilian sequences in Argentina. J. jaanussoni also has been reported from the Retterodus andinus to Tripodus laevis zones in North America (Ethington and Clark, 1981; Repetski, 1982). This species occurs in the Triangulodus larapintinensis Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section and the lowermost part of the Li section.

    Juanognathus variabilis Serpagli, 1974 Figure 7.6

  • Juanognathus variabilis Serpagli. Zhen et al., 2003a, p. 53, 54, pl. 4, figs. 1–14 (including synonymy); Agematsu et al., 2006a, fig. 7.4 (only).

  • Material.—One specimen; one b element (IGUT-ag 2002).

    Remarks.—According to Zhen et al. (2003a), a,b,c, d, and e elements constitute an apparatus of this species. The specimen reported herein is subsymmetrical juanognathiform and coincides with the description of the b element of Zhen et al. (2003a).

    Occurrence.—This is a representative species of the Floian and has been reported from Argentina (Serpagli, 1974; Albanesi, 1998a), Australia (Zhen et al., 2003a), North America (Ethington and Clark, 1981; Stouge and Bagnoli, 1988; Pohler, 1994), and Malaysia (Igo and Koike, 1967). The stratigraphic range of this species extends up into the lower Darriwilian in South China (Chen et al., 1995; Wang et al., 1996). The Triangulodus larapintinensis Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section includes this species.

    Juanognathus sp. Figure 7.5

  • Juanognathus sp. B. Agematsu et al., 2006a, fig. 7.19.

  • Material.—One specimen (IGUT-ag2022).

    Remarks.—Specimen is asymmetrical, conical in form and has remarkable, bladelike lateral costae. Cusp is proclined and twists inward. Anterior and posterior sides are flattened and rounded, respectively. Short base is posteriorly expanded. Bladelike costae of the element are similar to those of Juanognathus variabilis, but Juanognathus sp. differs from J. variabilis by the sharp blades and shallow and laterally narrow base.

    Occurrence.—The upper part of the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section.

    Genus Oelandodus van Wamel, 1974

    Type species.—Oistodus elongatus Lindström, 1955

    Oelandodus sp. Figures 5.5–5.7

    Material.—Seven specimens; four a, one b, and two f elements (IGUT-ag3494 to 3500).

    Description.—All specimens are laterally compressed. a elements are subsymmetrical and geniculate. Anterior and posterior margins of cusps and bases are sharply keeled. The cusp inclines slightly inwardly and bears a mid carina on the outer side. b element is asymmetrical with keeled anterior and posterior margins. Sharply edged anterolateral costa ranges from tip of cusp to basal margin. The geniculate f elements are asymmetrical with inwardly inclined cusp. Outer face of the cusp is broadly convex and has a mid carina. Base is characterized by carina parallel to the basal margin.

    Remarks.Van Wamel (1974) reconstructed the apparatus of this genus, which is composed of a, b, c, e, and f elements. a, b, and f elements are found in collections of this study.

    Occurrence.—Specimens of this species occur from the upper part of the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section in this study.

    Genus Panderodus Ethington, 1959

    Type species.—Paltodus unicostatus Branson and Mehl, 1933.

    Panderodus nogamii (Lee, 1975) Figures 5.9–5.11, 5.14

  • Panderodus sp. Serpagli, 1974, p. 59, pl. 24, figs. 12, 13, pl. 30, figs. 12, 13.

  • Panderodus nogamii (Lee). Cantrill and Burrett, 2003, p. 410–415, pl. 1, figs. 1–16; Zhang et al., 2003, p. 16, pl. 5, figs. 1–5; Kuhn and Barnes, 2005, p. 324, 326, figs. 3.19–3.21; Agematsu et al., 2006b, p. 225, 226, figs. 3.3, 3.4.

  • Parapanderodus nogamii (Lee). Watson, 1988, p. 124, 125, pl. 3, figs. 1, 6.

  • Parapanderodus paracornuformis (Ethington and Clark). Albanesi, 1998b, p. 116, 117, pl. 12, figs. 8–10, 12, 13 (only), text-fig. 9.

  • Protopanderodus nogamii (Lee). Zhen et al., 2003b, p. 207, 209, figs. 23.a–23.q; Zhen and Percival, 2004, p. 104, 105, figs. 18.a–18.k.

  • Protopanderodus primitus (Druce). Cooper, 1981, p. 174, 175, pl. 27, figs. 3, 4; Agematsu et al., 2006a, figs. 7.1–7.3.

  • Protopanderodus? primitus Cooper. Stait and Druce, 1993, p. 307, 308, text-figs. 13.a–c, 18.d, e, g–k.

  • Scolopodus cf. bassleri (Furnish), Igo and Koike, 1967, p. 23, pl. 3, figs. 7, 8, text-fig. 6.b.

  • Scolopodus nogamii Lee, 1975, p. 179, pl. 2, fig. 13, text-fig. 3.l.

  • Material.—Forty-one specimens; ten a, twelve b, eight c, and eleven g elements (IGUT-ag3501 to 3539, 3555, 3556).

    Remarks.a, b, c, and g elements are found in the study section. The a, b, and c elements construct a symmetry transition series. Specimens with a laterally compressed, short base are identified with the g element.

    Occurrence.P. nogamii is a relatively long-ranging species, reported from Middle and Upper Ordovician strata in Australia, China, Argentina, and Southeast Asia (Cantrill and Burrett, 2003). This species is present in the Thong Pha Phum and Li sections.

    Genus Plectodina Stauffer, 1935

    Type species.—Prioniodus aculeatus Stauffer, 1930

    Plectodina onychodonta An and Xu in An et al., 1983 Figure 7.2

  • Plectodina onychodonta An and Xu in An et al., 1983, p. 121, pl. 23, figs, 1–16, pl. 24, figs. 1–15, pl. 25, figs. 4, 7, text-figs. 13.19–24; Nicoll and Metcalfe, 2001, figs. 6.5–6.7.

  • Material.—Two specimens: two g elements (IGUT-ag 2019, 3540).

    Remarks.Ethington and Clark (1981) reconstructed apparatuses of this genus and described a, b, c, e, f, and g elements. Specimens from the study section correspond to the g element and coincide with the description of a prioniodiniform element of An et al. (1983).

    Occurrence.—This species is known from the upper Darriwilian rocks in North China (An et al., 1983; Wang et al., 1996) and the Middle Ordovician Stokes Siltstone in Australia (Nicoll and Metcalfe, 2001). In this study, P. onychodonta occurs in the uppermost part of the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section.

    Genus Scolopodus Pander, 1856

    Type species.—Scolopodus sublaevis Pander, 1856

    Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856 Figures 5.1, 5.2

  • Scolopodus quadratus Pander. Zhen et al., 2003a p. 58, 59, pl. 5, figs. 15–21.

  • Scolopodus rex Lindström. Wang et al., 1996, pl. 2, figs. 18, 19; Albanesi, 1998b, p. 133, pl. 12, figs. 14–17.

  • Scolopodus striatus Pander. Tolmacheva, 2006, p. 255–259, figs. 5.a, 5.b, 5.d–f, 6–8 (including synonymy).

  • Material.—Nine specimens: six “acontiodiform” and three “scandodifrom” elements (IGUT-ag3563 to 3571).

    Remarks.—Our specimens are symmetrical acontiodiform and asymmetrical scandodiform elements, and coincide with the description by Tolmacheva (2006).

    Occurrence.—This is a widely known species in the North Atlantic area and stratigraphically ranges from the Paroistodus proteus Zone to the Baltoniodus norrlandicus Zone. This species has also been reported from China, Australia, and Argentina (Wang et al., 1996; Albanesi, 1998b; Zhen et al., 2003a). The Kanchanaburi section yields this species.

    Genus Triangulodus van Wamel, 1974

    Type species.—Paltodus volchovensis Sergeeva, 1963

    Triangulodus larapintinensis (Crespin, 1943) Figures 6.4–6.8

  • Oistodus larapintinensis Crespin, 1943, p. 231, pl. 31, figs. i-6, 9, 12, 13.

  • Scandodus brevibasis (Sergeeva). Agematsu et al., 2006a, fig. 7.20.

  • Triangulodus comptus (Branson and Mehl). Agematsu et al., 2006a, figs. 7.8, 7.9.

  • Triangulodus larapintinensis (Crespin). Stait and Druce, 1993, p. 315, 317, figs. 14.a–c, 21.d–f, h–j; Zhen et al., 2003a, p. 212–216, figs. 28.a–v; Agematsu et al., 2006b, p. 228, figs. 3.21–3.23.

  • Trigonodus larapintinensis (Crespin). Cooper, 1981, p. 180, pl. 27, figs. 5, 6, 11, 12, 16, 17; Watson, 1988, p. 129, pl. 2, figs. 12–14, 18–20, 22, 23.

  • Materials.—Eighteen specimens; four a, nine b, and three c elements, one d element, and one f element (IGUT-ag2034IGUT-ag2035, 3473 to 3486, 3551, 3552).

    Description.—Specimens are slender coniform. The asymmetrical a element is characterized by erect cusp with keeled anterolateral and posterior margins. The b element is asymmetrical tricostate with an erect cusp. Anterior, posterior and inner sides bear sharply edged costae running throughout the unit. Anterior surface is round to flat. Basal margin is triangular in aboral view. Symmetrical c element has proclined to erect cusp with one posterior and two keeled lateral costae. d element resembles a element, but is twisted and asymmetrical. Laterally compressed f element has erect cusp and anterior and posterior edges.

    Remarks.—We follow the description of Zhen et al. (2003b). Collections of this study yield a, b, c, d, and f elements. Agematsu et al. (2006a) assigned the specimens regarded as b elements in this study to Acodus comptus (Branson and Mehl, 1933). According to Ethington and Clark (1981) and Zhen et al. (2003a), the apparatus of A. comptus contains multicostate elements, which develop three or more bladelike costae. However, all specimens in this study bear less than three costae, which are keeled but inconspicuous.

    Occurrence.—This species has been reported from the Lower and Middle Ordovician rocks in Australia and Thailand (Cooper, 1981; Watson, 1988; Zhen et al., 2003a; Agematu et al., 2006b). Specimens of this species are found in the T. larapintinensis Zone in the Thong Pha Phum section and the upper part of the Li section.

    Genus Unknown

    Coniform element indet. A Figure 5.8

    Materials.—Four specimens (IGUT-ag2023, 3548 to 3550).

    Remarks.—Specimens are strongly anteroposteriorly compressed. Elements are characterized by faint carinae on lateral sides of cusp, by a short base, and a small basal cavity expanded inward.

    Occurrence.—In the Aurilobodus leptosomatus Zone of the Thong Pha Phum section.

    Acknowledgments

    We are much indebted to the referees, G. S. Nowlan and O. Lehnert, for critical reading of the manuscript. We would like to thank the Department of Mineral Resources of Thailand for providing facilities for the field research. The fieldwork was partly funded by a grant from the Mombusyo International Scientific Research (Number 11440148 to K. Sashida), Grant-in-Aid of FGI from the Fukada Geological Institute (to S. Agematsu), and Grant-in-aid for JSPS Fellows from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to S. Agematsu).

    References

    1.

    G. P. Abaimova 1971. New Early Ordovician conodonts from the southeastern part of the Siberian Platform. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal vol. 1971:no. 4p. 486–493. Google Scholar

    2.

    S. Agematsu, K. Sashida, S. Salyapongse, and A. Sardsud . 2006a. Ordovician conodonts from the Thong Pha Phum area, western Thailand. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences vol. 26:p. 49–60. Google Scholar

    3.

    S. Agematsu, K. Sashida, S. Salyapongse, and A. Sardsud . 2006b. Lower and Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Thung Song and Thung Wa areas, southern peninsular Thailand. Paleontological Research vol. 10:p. 215–231. Google Scholar

    4.

    G. L. Albanesi 1998a. Biofacies de conodontes de las secuencias ordovícicas del cerro Potrerillo, Precordillera central de San Juan, R. Argentina. In M. A. Hünicken , editor. ed. Biostratigrafía, biofacies y taxonomía de conodontes de las secuencias ordovícicas del cerro Potrerillo, Precordillera Central de San Juan, R. Argentina p. 75–98.Actas de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias. Córdoba. Google Scholar

    5.

    G. L. Albanesi 1998b. Taxonomía de conodontes de las secuencias ordovícicas del cerro Potrerillo, Precordillera Central de San Juan, R. Argentina. In M. A. Hünicken , editor. ed. Biostratigrafía, biofacies y taxonomía de conodontes de las secuencias Ordovícicas del cerro Potrerillo, Precordillera Central de San Juan, R. Argentina p. 101–249.Actas de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias. Córdoba. Google Scholar

    6.

    T. An, F. Zhang, W. Xiang, Y. Zhang, W. Xu, H. Zhang, D. Jiang, C. Yang, L. Lin, Z. Cui, and X. Yang . 1983. The conodonts of North China and the adjacent regions p. Science Press of China. Beijing. Google Scholar

    7.

    C. R. Barnes, D. J. Kennedy, A. D. McCracken, G. S. Nowlan, and G. A. Tarrant . 1979. The structure and evolution of Ordovician conodont apparatuses. Lethaia vol. 12:p. 125–151. Google Scholar

    8.

    C. R. Barnes and M. L S. Poplawski . 1973. Lower and Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Mystic Formation, Quebec, Canada. Journal of Paleontology vol. 47:p. 760–790. Google Scholar

    9.

    E. B. Branson and M. G. Mehl . 1933. Conodont studies I and II. University of Missouri Studies vol. 8:p. 1–167. Google Scholar

    10.

    G. F. Brown, S. Buravas, J. Charaljavanaphet, N. Nalinchandra, W. D. Johnston, C. Stresthrapura Jr., and G. C. Tayor Jr. . 1951. Geologic reconnaissance of the mineral deposits of Thailand. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin [no.].984pp. 1–183. Google Scholar

    11.

    S. Bunopas 1981. Paleogeographic history of western Thailand and adjacent part of southeast Asia: A plate tectonics interpretation p. Geological Survey Paper 5, Special Issue. Department of Mineral Resources of Thailand. Bangkok. Google Scholar

    12.

    S. Bunopas 1992. Regional stratigraphic correlation in Thailand. In C. Piancharoen , editor. ed. Proceedings of a National Conference on Geologic Resources of Thailand p. 189–208.Bangkok. Google Scholar

    13.

    R. C. Cantrill and C. F. Burrett . 2003. The greater Gondwana distribution of the Ordovician conodont Panderodus nogamii (Lee 1975). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg vol. 245:p. 407–419. Google Scholar

    14.

    X. Chen, M. Peng, and C. Jin . 1995. Lower Ordovician conodonts from Tudi'ao, Yanhe County, Guizhou. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica vol. 12:p. 323–332. Google Scholar

    15.

    L. R M. Cocks, R. A. Fortey, and C. P. Lee . 2005. A review of Lower and Middle Palaeozoic biostratigraphy in west peninsular Malaysia and southern Thailand in its context within the Sibumasu Terrane. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences vol. 24:p. 703–717. Google Scholar

    16.

    B. J. Cooper 1981. Early Ordovician conodonts from the Horn Valley Siltstone, central Australia. Palaeontology vol. 24:p. 147–183. Google Scholar

    17.

    I. Crespin 1943. Conodonts from the Waterhouse Range, central Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia vol. 67:p. 231–233. Google Scholar

    18.

    P. Du, Z. Zhao, Z. Huang, Z. Tan, C. Wang, Z. Yang, G. Zhang, and J. Xiao . 2005. Discussion on four conodont species of Histiodella from Tarim Basin and their stratigraphic implication. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica vol. 22:p. 357–369. Google Scholar

    19.

    R. L. Ethington 1959. Conodonts of the Ordovician Galena Formation. Journal of Paleontology vol. 33:p. 257–292. Google Scholar

    20.

    R. L. Ethington and D. L. Clark . 1981. Lower and Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Ibex area, western Millard County, Utah Brigham Young University Geology Studies. vol. 28:pt. 2pp. 1–155. Google Scholar

    21.

    R. L. Ethington and D. Schumacher . 1969. Conodonts of the Copenhagen Formation (Middle Ordovician) in central Nevada. Journal of Paleontology vol. 43:p. 440–484. Google Scholar

    22.

    R. W. Graves and S. Ellison . 1941. Ordovician conodonts of the Marathon Basin, Texas. University of Missouri School of Mining and Metallurgy Bulletin, Technical Series vol. 14:p. 1–26. Google Scholar

    23.

    D. Hagan and E. Kemper . 1976. Geology of the Thong Pha Phum area (Kanchanaburi Province, eastern Thailand). Geologisches Jahrbuch vol. B21:p. 53–91. Google Scholar

    24.

    L. Hahn and M. Siebenhüner . 1982. Explanatory notes (Paleontology) on the Geological Maps of Northern and Western Thailand 1:250,000 p. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe. Hannover. Google Scholar

    25.

    T. Hamada, H. Igo, T. Kobayashi, and T. Koike . 1975. Older and Middle Palaeozoic formations and fossils of Thailand and Malaysia. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography vol. 45:p. 1–39. Google Scholar

    26.

    R. W. Harris 1962. New conodonts from the Joins (Ordovician) Formation of Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geology Notes vol. 22:p. 199–211. Google Scholar

    27.

    A. G. Harris, S. M. Bergström, R. L. Ethington, and R. J. Ross . 1979. Aspects of Middle and Upper Ordovician conodont biostra tigraphy of carbonate facies in Nevada and southeast California and comparison with some Appalachian successions. Brigham Young University Geology Studies vol. 26:p. 7–33. Google Scholar

    28.

    H. Igo and T. Koike . 1967. Ordovician and Silurian conodonts from the Langkawi Islands, Malaysia, Part I. In T. Kobayashi and R. Toriyama , editors. eds. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia 3 p. 1–35.University of Tokyo Press. Tokyo. Google Scholar

    29.

    D. I. Johnston and C. R. Barnes . 2000. Early and Middle Ordovician (Arenig) conodonts from St. Paul's Inlet and Martin Point, Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, Canada. Geologica et Palaeontologica vol. 34:p. 11–87. Google Scholar

    30.

    M. Keller and O. Lehnert . 1998. The Rio Sassito sedimentary succession (Ordovician): a pinpoint in the geodynamic evolution of the Argentine Precordillera. Geologische Rundschau vol. 87:p. 326–344. Google Scholar

    31.

    T. Kobayashi 1961. On the occurrence of Ordovician nautiloids in North Thailand. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography vol. 32:p. 79–84. Google Scholar

    32.

    T. Kobayashi 1984. Older Palaeozoic gastropods and cephalopods of Thailand and Malaysia. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia vol. 25:p. 195–199. Google Scholar

    33.

    T. S. Kuhn and C. R. Barnes . 2005. Ordovician conodonts from the Mithaka Formation (Georgina Basin, Australia). Regional and paleobiogeographical implications. Geologica Acta vol. 3:p. 317–337. Google Scholar

    34.

    H. Lee 1975. Conodonten aus dem unteren und mittleren Ordovizium von Nordkorea. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A vol. A150:p. 161–186. Google Scholar

    35.

    H. Lee 1976. Conodonts from the Maggol and Jeongseon Formation (Ordovician), Kangweon-Do, South Korea. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea vol. 12:p. 151–181. Google Scholar

    36.

    O. Lehnert 1995. Ordovizische Conodonten aus der Präkordillere Westargentiniens: ihre Bedeutung für Stratigraphie und Paläogeographie. Erlanger Geologische Abhandlungen vol. 125:p. 1–193. Google Scholar

    37.

    M. Lindström 1955. Conodonts from the lowermost Ordovician strata of south-central Sweden. Geologiska Foreningens i Stockholm Forhandlingar vol. 76:p. 517–604. Google Scholar

    38.

    M. Lindström 1971. Lower Ordovician conodonts of Europe. Geological Society of America Memoir vol. 127:p. 21–61. Google Scholar

    39.

    A. Löfgren 1978. Arenigian and Llanvirnian conodonts from Jamtland, northern Sweden. Fossils and Strata vol. 13:p. 1–129. Google Scholar

    40.

    A. Löfgren 2000. Conodont biozonation in the upper Arenig of Sweden. Geological Magazine vol. 137:p. 53–65. Google Scholar

    41.

    T. Metcalfe 2006. Palaeozoic and Mesozoic tectonic evolution and palaeogeography of East Asian crustal fragments: The Korean peninsula in context. Gondwana Research vol. 9:p. 24–46. Google Scholar

    42.

    R. S. Nicoll and I. Metcalfe . 2001. Cambrian to Permian conodont biogeography. In I. Metcalfe, J. M B. Smith, M. Morwood, and I. Davidson , editors. eds. Faunal and Floral Migrations and Evolution in SE Asia-Australasia p. 59–72.A. A. Balkema. Lisse. Google Scholar

    43.

    G. S. Nowlan and J. G. Thurlow . 1983. Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Buchans Group, central Newfoundland, and their significance for regional stratigraphy of the Central Volcanic Belt. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences vol. 21:p. 284–296. Google Scholar

    44.

    C. H. Pander 1856. Monographie der fossilen Fische der silurischen Systems der russisch-baltischen Gouvernements p. Akademie der Wissenechaften. St. Petersburg. Google Scholar

    45.

    S. M L. Pohler 1994. Conodont biofacies of Lower to Lower Middle Ordovician megaconglomerates, Cow Head Group, Western Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin [no.] 459p. 1–71. Google Scholar

    46.

    lJ. Pyle and C. R. Barnes . 2002. Taxonomy, Evolution, and Biostratigraphy of Conodonts from the Kechika Formation, Skoki Formation, and Road River Group (Upper Cambrian to Lower Silurian), Northeastern British Columbia p. National Research Council of Canada Monograph Publishing Program. Ottawa. Google Scholar

    47.

    J. A. Rasmussen 2001. Conodont biostratigraphy and taxonomy of the Ordovician shelf margin deposits in the Scandinavian Caledonides. Fossils and Strata vol. 48:p. 1–179. Google Scholar

    48.

    J. E. Repetski 1982. Conodonts from El Paso Group (Lower Ordovician) of western Texas and southern New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir no. 40p. 1–119. Google Scholar

    49.

    S. P. Sergeeva 1963. Conodonts from the Lower Ordovician of the Leningrad region. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal vol. 1963:no. 2p. 93–108. Google Scholar

    50.

    E. Serpagli 1974. Lower Ordovician conodonts from Precordilleran Argentina (Province of San Juan). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana vol. 13:p. 17–93. Google Scholar

    51.

    B. A. Stait and C. F. Burrett . 1984. Ordovician nautiloid faunas of central and southern Thailand. Geological Magazine vol. 121:p. 115–124. Google Scholar

    52.

    K. Stait and E. C. Druce . 1993. Conodonts from the Lower Ordovician Coolibah Formation, Georgina Basin, central Australia. BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics vol. 13:p. 293–322. Google Scholar

    53.

    C. R. Stauffer 1930. Conodonts from the Decorah Shale. Journal of Paleontology vol. 4:p. 121–128. Google Scholar

    54.

    C. R. Stauffer 1935. The conodont fauna of the Decorah Shale (Ordovician). Journal of Paleontology vol. 9:p. 596–620. Google Scholar

    55.

    S. S. Stouge 1984. Conodonts of the Middle Ordovician Table Head Formation, western Newfoundland. Fossils and Strata vol. 16:p. 1–145. Google Scholar

    56.

    S. Stouge and G. Bagnoli . 1988. Early Ordovician conodonts from Cow Head Peninsula, Western Newfoundland. Palaeontographia Italica vol. 75:p. 89–179. Google Scholar

    57.

    W. C. Sweet and C. M. Tolbert . 1997. An Ibexian (Lower Ordovician) reference section in the southern Egan Range, Nevada, for a conodont-based chronostratigraphy. Geological Survey Professional Paper vol. 1579-B:p. 53–84. Google Scholar

    58.

    T. Y. Tolmacheva 2006. Apparatus of the conodont Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856 and a re-evaluation of Pander's species of Scolopodus. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica vol. 51:p. 247–260. Google Scholar

    59.

    W. A. van Wamel 1974. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician of north-western Öland, southeastern Sweden. Utrecht Micropalaeontological Bulletins vol. 10:p. 1–125. Google Scholar

    60.

    Z. Wang, S. M. Bergström, and H. R. Lane . 1996. Conodont provinces and biostratigraphy in Ordovician of China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 35:p. 26–59. Google Scholar

    61.

    Z. Wang and K. Luo . 1984. Late Cambrian and Ordovician conodonts from the marginal areas of the Ordos Platform, China. Bulletin of Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academica Sinica vol. 8:p. 239–304. Google Scholar

    62.

    S. T. Watson 1988. Ordovician conodonts from the Canning Basin (W. Australia). Palaeontologica vol. 203:p. 91–147. Google Scholar

    63.

    T. Wongwanich, C. Burrett, W. Tansathein, and P. Chaodumrong . 1990. Lower to Mid Palaeozoic stratigraphy of mainland Satun province, southern Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Science vol. 4:p. 1–9. Google Scholar

    64.

    J. Zhang, C. R. Barnes, and B. J. Cooper . 2003. Early Late Ordovician conodonts from the Stokes Siltstone, Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg vol. 245:p. 1–38. Google Scholar

    65.

    Y. Zhen, R. S. Nicoll, I. G. Percival, M. A. Hamedi, and I. Stewart . 2001. Ordovician rhipidognathid conodonts from Australia and Iran. Journal of Paleontology vol. 75:p. 186–207. Google Scholar

    66.

    Y. Zhen and I. Percival . 2004. Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) conodonts from allochthonous limestones in the Oakdale Formation of central New South Wales. Alcheringa vol. 28:p. 77–111. Google Scholar

    67.

    Y. Zhen, I. G. Percival, and B. D. Webby . 2003a. Early Ordovician (Bendigonian) conodonts from central New South Wales, Australia. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg vol. 245:p. 39–73. Google Scholar

    68.

    Y. Zhen, I. G. Percival, and B. D. Webby . 2003b. Early Ordovician conodonts from far western New South Wales, Australia. Records of the Australian Museum vol. 55:p. 169–220. Google Scholar
    Sachiko Agematsu, Katsuo Sashida, and Apsorn Sardsud "Reinterpretation of Early and Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Thong Pha Phum area, western Thailand, in the context of new material from western and northern Thailand," Paleontological Research 12(2), 181-194, (1 June 2008). https://doi.org/10.2517/1342-8144(2008)12[181:ROEAMO]2.0.CO;2
    Received: 1 May 2007; Accepted: 24 January 2008; Published: 1 June 2008
    KEYWORDS
    biostratigraphy
    conodont
    Kanchanaburi
    Li
    Ordovician
    Thailand
    Thong Pha Phum
    Back to Top